1 00:00:13,129 --> 00:00:10,670 okay so I'll start out with presenting 2 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:13,139 my goal is to find a small efficient 3 00:00:17,870 --> 00:00:16,290 ligating right design and I hope I know 4 00:00:20,510 --> 00:00:17,880 you guys know what a ribozyme is it's an 5 00:00:23,720 --> 00:00:20,520 RNA that has catalytic function and why 6 00:00:25,519 --> 00:00:23,730 ligation well um you're going to talk 7 00:00:28,220 --> 00:00:25,529 about origin of life studies you want to 8 00:00:30,769 --> 00:00:28,230 try to generate more complex products so 9 00:00:32,569 --> 00:00:30,779 your product should be more complex than 10 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:32,579 your starting material and that's what 11 00:00:35,810 --> 00:00:34,290 ligation is ligation is taking two 12 00:00:37,910 --> 00:00:35,820 pieces of RNA you're putting them 13 00:00:40,490 --> 00:00:37,920 together you're like a ting them into 14 00:00:42,980 --> 00:00:40,500 one product a more complex product so I 15 00:00:45,050 --> 00:00:42,990 want to increase ligation in a ribozyme 16 00:00:48,470 --> 00:00:45,060 and I want to try using different 17 00:00:50,710 --> 00:00:48,480 conditions particularly by freezing and 18 00:00:52,580 --> 00:00:50,720 then I want to increase that yield by 19 00:00:56,030 --> 00:00:52,590 introducing thermal cycling or 20 00:00:57,560 --> 00:00:56,040 freeze-thaw cycles so I won't go very 21 00:00:59,450 --> 00:00:57,570 much in the background for the RNA world 22 00:01:02,569 --> 00:00:59,460 I I'm gonna see I'm assuming that 23 00:01:06,460 --> 00:01:02,579 everyone know this by now um that this 24 00:01:08,990 --> 00:01:06,470 idea started around the late 1960s and 25 00:01:11,179 --> 00:01:09,000 it suggested that RNA is the first 26 00:01:13,099 --> 00:01:11,189 biomolecule as opposed to DNA or protein 27 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:13,109 and it's because RNA can store 28 00:01:18,260 --> 00:01:16,170 information and it also has an enzymatic 29 00:01:20,809 --> 00:01:18,270 function but the mage one of the major 30 00:01:22,849 --> 00:01:20,819 problems for RNA is that it's fragile 31 00:01:24,649 --> 00:01:22,859 and if you ask anybody who worked with 32 00:01:26,419 --> 00:01:24,659 RNA they'll tell you it's prone to 33 00:01:28,730 --> 00:01:26,429 degradation so if you heat it it'll 34 00:01:30,940 --> 00:01:28,740 probably degrade and pray if you have 35 00:01:34,459 --> 00:01:30,950 something like magnesium in your sample 36 00:01:37,129 --> 00:01:34,469 um so one solution to that is lowering 37 00:01:39,649 --> 00:01:37,139 your incubation temperature and when you 38 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:39,659 I guess when a lot of people think about 39 00:01:43,669 --> 00:01:41,850 freezing or ice they think about all the 40 00:01:45,980 --> 00:01:43,679 water molecules and all the solute sin 41 00:01:48,349 --> 00:01:45,990 solid phase well that's true if you have 42 00:01:49,940 --> 00:01:48,359 if you go below this eutectic 43 00:01:52,539 --> 00:01:49,950 temperature on this phase diagram here 44 00:01:54,859 --> 00:01:52,549 what we're interested in is this 45 00:01:57,859 --> 00:01:54,869 triangle area here where the majority of 46 00:02:00,859 --> 00:01:57,869 the water molecule isn't is in an ice 47 00:02:03,949 --> 00:02:00,869 crystal but the remaining liquid water 48 00:02:06,410 --> 00:02:03,959 is mixed with your solute and that makes 49 00:02:08,359 --> 00:02:06,420 up your eutectic composition and this 50 00:02:12,650 --> 00:02:08,369 eutectic composition exists in channels 51 00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:12,660 very small micro meter in width grooves 52 00:02:17,870 --> 00:02:15,090 and it's shown right here so very small 53 00:02:18,559 --> 00:02:17,880 tunnels a nice and this provides a 54 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:18,569 protective 55 00:02:23,809 --> 00:02:21,450 for your RNA it concentrates your solute 56 00:02:25,369 --> 00:02:23,819 and for your RNA you could also reach 57 00:02:27,369 --> 00:02:25,379 alternative stable conformation that 58 00:02:29,569 --> 00:02:27,379 wouldn't be possible if you tried 59 00:02:32,569 --> 00:02:29,579 incubating at higher temperatures and 60 00:02:35,780 --> 00:02:32,579 and above all your RNA can still retain 61 00:02:39,920 --> 00:02:35,790 some enzymatic function this is 62 00:02:41,899 --> 00:02:39,930 demonstrated by by the r18 polymerase 63 00:02:45,020 --> 00:02:41,909 this this was this is from a paper in 64 00:02:48,009 --> 00:02:45,030 2010 the r18 polymerase is an artificial 65 00:02:51,800 --> 00:02:48,019 ribozyme it's lab-created and it's 66 00:02:55,580 --> 00:02:51,810 outlined in black right here and it 67 00:02:58,129 --> 00:02:55,590 binds to this template in green and it 68 00:03:00,740 --> 00:02:58,139 adds nucleotides one by one to this 69 00:03:02,300 --> 00:03:00,750 primer strand right here so when people 70 00:03:03,979 --> 00:03:02,310 think about polymerase they think about 71 00:03:06,619 --> 00:03:03,989 a polymerase that's made out of protein 72 00:03:08,509 --> 00:03:06,629 and a common one is this t7 RNA 73 00:03:11,809 --> 00:03:08,519 polymerase right here from bacteriophage 74 00:03:14,990 --> 00:03:11,819 and it does wonderfully at 37 degrees so 75 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:15,000 the higher you see these bands up here 76 00:03:19,759 --> 00:03:17,010 the higher you go the more the longer 77 00:03:21,259 --> 00:03:19,769 the projects are but at negative 7 if 78 00:03:25,749 --> 00:03:21,269 you freeze it you don't see any 79 00:03:29,839 --> 00:03:25,759 polymerization so how does the r18 fair 80 00:03:31,039 --> 00:03:29,849 at 37 it's not shown here at 37 it 81 00:03:33,920 --> 00:03:31,049 doesn't do so well because the 82 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:33,930 polymerase degrades but if you start at 83 00:03:38,149 --> 00:03:36,090 a slightly lower temperature than a room 84 00:03:41,110 --> 00:03:38,159 temperature it does compare ibly well as 85 00:03:48,110 --> 00:03:41,120 the protein polymerase but the major 86 00:03:51,050 --> 00:03:48,120 difference is at negative 7 so here the 87 00:03:53,749 --> 00:03:51,060 r18 can still catalyze polymerization at 88 00:03:57,860 --> 00:03:53,759 negative 7 below freezing where the 89 00:03:59,629 --> 00:03:57,870 protein equivalent you see no product at 90 00:04:02,689 --> 00:03:59,639 all so this is something that RNA can do 91 00:04:04,939 --> 00:04:02,699 that the protein can't but this plum 92 00:04:07,879 --> 00:04:04,949 race is a little too long I don't it's a 93 00:04:12,110 --> 00:04:07,889 little too big for what I want to what I 94 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:12,120 want to work with so this this is what 95 00:04:16,610 --> 00:04:13,290 I'm actually working with this is the 96 00:04:19,810 --> 00:04:16,620 hammerhead ribozyme and this was a first 97 00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:19,820 found in the mid-1980s in plant varese 98 00:04:24,969 --> 00:04:22,650 this specific sequence though is from 99 00:04:28,070 --> 00:04:24,979 justice omen which is a parasitic worm 100 00:04:30,980 --> 00:04:28,080 so this fri design is traditionally 101 00:04:32,030 --> 00:04:30,990 known to cleave and not like it even 102 00:04:36,500 --> 00:04:32,040 though they're both reverse 103 00:04:38,570 --> 00:04:36,510 reactions so in a cleavage reaction you 104 00:04:41,630 --> 00:04:38,580 would have the enzyme which I outlined 105 00:04:43,700 --> 00:04:41,640 in red here bind to the substrate in 106 00:04:45,740 --> 00:04:43,710 blue and it would cleave it or cut into 107 00:04:48,470 --> 00:04:45,750 two pieces generating two fragments of 108 00:04:51,290 --> 00:04:48,480 this p1 fragment down here and this P to 109 00:04:53,030 --> 00:04:51,300 fragment up there in a ligation reaction 110 00:04:56,090 --> 00:04:53,040 the opposite would happen where the 111 00:04:57,650 --> 00:04:56,100 ribozyme binds to p1 fragment and the p2 112 00:05:01,130 --> 00:04:57,660 fragment and it would like it it back 113 00:05:02,900 --> 00:05:01,140 together back to one strand efficient 114 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:02,910 ligation with this sequence wasn't 115 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:04,970 demonstrated until two thousand seven 116 00:05:11,570 --> 00:05:08,970 here the p1 fragment is labeled and if 117 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:11,580 it's like ated to p2 then you should see 118 00:05:16,640 --> 00:05:13,770 this band shift up here and this was 119 00:05:18,590 --> 00:05:16,650 done at room temperature but it was only 120 00:05:20,750 --> 00:05:18,600 possible if you added millimolar amounts 121 00:05:24,110 --> 00:05:20,760 of magnesium and this is a fast reaction 122 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:24,120 so here 18 seconds you're done and their 123 00:05:29,500 --> 00:05:27,210 maximum yield 23% I thought this was a 124 00:05:33,020 --> 00:05:29,510 great ribozyme to start out with I 125 00:05:34,630 --> 00:05:33,030 started out with magnesium repeating 126 00:05:37,580 --> 00:05:34,640 their experiments but I also tried 127 00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:37,590 calcium and iron and in short they 128 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:39,210 worked but that's not the focus of this 129 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:40,410 talk although you're welcome to ask me 130 00:05:47,300 --> 00:05:45,210 about it iron people so what I'm focused 131 00:05:49,610 --> 00:05:47,310 on is ligation through freezing and if 132 00:05:52,430 --> 00:05:49,620 you do it this way you don't have to 133 00:05:55,790 --> 00:05:52,440 have divalent cations in your sample um 134 00:05:58,070 --> 00:05:55,800 this this is just a shorter example of 135 00:06:02,180 --> 00:05:58,080 the different temperatures I used and I 136 00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:02,190 think that C is supposed to go there but 137 00:06:07,700 --> 00:06:05,610 temperature alone isn't enough so as 138 00:06:08,900 --> 00:06:07,710 demonstrated here these two lanes right 139 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:08,910 here they're incubated at the same 140 00:06:13,490 --> 00:06:11,250 temperature negative 10 but one was 141 00:06:16,220 --> 00:06:13,500 frozen before incubation and one remain 142 00:06:17,270 --> 00:06:16,230 liquid the entire time so even though 143 00:06:18,620 --> 00:06:17,280 it's the same rank you Batian 144 00:06:21,380 --> 00:06:18,630 temperature you still have very 145 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:21,390 different results this demonstrates that 146 00:06:27,590 --> 00:06:23,730 you need freezing or the concentrating 147 00:06:30,020 --> 00:06:27,600 effect to get ligation so next we looked 148 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:30,030 at how fast this reaction is and while 149 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:32,610 it's not that 18 seconds from that you 150 00:06:39,140 --> 00:06:35,730 get with magnesium we still get a higher 151 00:06:42,230 --> 00:06:39,150 final yield and based on this the 152 00:06:44,450 --> 00:06:42,240 majority ligations done in an hour so we 153 00:06:46,490 --> 00:06:44,460 decided to use one hour in our thermal 154 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:46,500 cycling experiments so thermal cycling 155 00:06:54,260 --> 00:06:50,010 is freestyle cycling and it's supposed 156 00:06:56,450 --> 00:06:54,270 to mimic day-night cycles so each of our 157 00:06:58,280 --> 00:06:56,460 cycles is there's a two-minute heat step 158 00:07:01,159 --> 00:06:58,290 and then there's an hour long incubation 159 00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:01,169 free step so that's one cycle here and 160 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:03,090 then two cycles you have to heat steps 161 00:07:09,230 --> 00:07:06,650 and then two-hour-long free steps and 162 00:07:15,020 --> 00:07:09,240 that wasn't supposed to happen you 163 00:07:16,340 --> 00:07:15,030 should see like fans up here so our base 164 00:07:17,780 --> 00:07:16,350 yield what we started out with is 165 00:07:20,090 --> 00:07:17,790 twenty-five percent but with each 166 00:07:22,070 --> 00:07:20,100 additional cycle so basically each 167 00:07:27,110 --> 00:07:22,080 additional day we should get more and 168 00:07:28,940 --> 00:07:27,120 more like ated product so we thought 169 00:07:31,670 --> 00:07:28,950 this was a you know great start but 170 00:07:33,320 --> 00:07:31,680 before going further into cycling 171 00:07:35,860 --> 00:07:33,330 experiments we were to try increasing 172 00:07:39,170 --> 00:07:35,870 that base yield that twenty five percent 173 00:07:41,060 --> 00:07:39,180 so it already briefly went over 174 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:41,070 different temperatures you can get 175 00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:42,690 between twenty-five to thirty percent 176 00:07:48,530 --> 00:07:44,850 depending on if you're between negative 177 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:48,540 20 or negative 10 we tried looking at 178 00:07:53,690 --> 00:07:51,330 sugars of millimolar amounts of glucose 179 00:07:57,050 --> 00:07:53,700 sucrose lactose your halos well it 180 00:07:58,520 --> 00:07:57,060 didn't help it didn't hurt we tried 181 00:08:00,920 --> 00:07:58,530 looking at different buffers pipis 182 00:08:02,450 --> 00:08:00,930 sodium phosphate Tris and as long as 183 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:02,460 they were the same pH they were 184 00:08:08,390 --> 00:08:05,970 comparable pH pH is important so our 185 00:08:12,050 --> 00:08:08,400 standard is ph 8 and if you go a little 186 00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:12,060 higher it didn't change the a yield but 187 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:14,010 if you go lower it'll start decreasing 188 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:19,050 that yield and if you go about 5.5 it 189 00:08:23,150 --> 00:08:20,370 just killed the reaction there's just no 190 00:08:24,980 --> 00:08:23,160 ligation going on now amino acids now 191 00:08:28,940 --> 00:08:24,990 why would I be talking about amino acids 192 00:08:31,700 --> 00:08:28,950 if if this is in the context of the RNA 193 00:08:35,350 --> 00:08:31,710 world well let's face it I doubt early 194 00:08:39,709 --> 00:08:35,360 Earth was as clean as our test tubes so 195 00:08:41,870 --> 00:08:39,719 we decided to look at what would happen 196 00:08:45,020 --> 00:08:41,880 if we added or contaminated our samples 197 00:08:48,260 --> 00:08:45,030 with amino acids so we tried looking at 198 00:08:51,110 --> 00:08:48,270 the 20 standard amino acids and I didn't 199 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:51,120 list all of them but 18 out of 20 fell 200 00:08:55,660 --> 00:08:53,810 in this category here none of them 201 00:08:57,310 --> 00:08:55,670 increased the ligation yield but none of 202 00:09:00,730 --> 00:08:57,320 them dropped it below twenty percent 203 00:09:02,500 --> 00:09:00,740 only two of them drastically reduced our 204 00:09:05,560 --> 00:09:02,510 yield which is tryptophan and isoleucine 205 00:09:08,260 --> 00:09:05,570 and overall I think this is good news 206 00:09:10,530 --> 00:09:08,270 because the the earliest amino acids at 207 00:09:12,910 --> 00:09:10,540 least the ones that are proposed 208 00:09:17,380 --> 00:09:12,920 earliest amino acid they're on this side 209 00:09:19,390 --> 00:09:17,390 of the list and the last thing we tried 210 00:09:21,460 --> 00:09:19,400 was anions this might sound a little 211 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:21,470 strange because with RNA studies usually 212 00:09:26,380 --> 00:09:24,650 focus more on cation cation effects and 213 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:26,390 that's because RNA is negatively charged 214 00:09:32,829 --> 00:09:28,250 cations are positive so you expect 215 00:09:35,829 --> 00:09:32,839 interactions we didn't think that anions 216 00:09:40,210 --> 00:09:35,839 would contribute very much but well we 217 00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:40,220 were wrong so depending on which sodium 218 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:43,370 salt you used you get very different 219 00:09:48,190 --> 00:09:46,370 results our best ones were from acetate 220 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:48,200 for weed and citrate and we think it has 221 00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:49,370 something to do with their carboxyl 222 00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:52,250 groups fluoride chloride bromide and 223 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:56,210 iodide they seem to follow some general 224 00:09:59,380 --> 00:09:57,770 patterns like fluorine and chlorine are 225 00:10:01,780 --> 00:09:59,390 supposed to be like more electronegative 226 00:10:04,030 --> 00:10:01,790 than bromine and iodine they're also 227 00:10:06,100 --> 00:10:04,040 smaller in size then bromine and iodine 228 00:10:08,230 --> 00:10:06,110 and in the context of chemical abundance 229 00:10:11,350 --> 00:10:08,240 there's a lot more fluorine and chlorine 230 00:10:13,420 --> 00:10:11,360 than bromine and iodine and we also took 231 00:10:16,090 --> 00:10:13,430 this as another piece of good news 232 00:10:19,540 --> 00:10:16,100 because based on this we don't want a 233 00:10:21,970 --> 00:10:19,550 lot of bromine and iodine around we're 234 00:10:26,110 --> 00:10:21,980 still not sure exactly how the anions 235 00:10:29,470 --> 00:10:26,120 are affecting the the ligation yield but 236 00:10:31,810 --> 00:10:29,480 we but we are exploring some ideas so 237 00:10:33,820 --> 00:10:31,820 that's where we are experimentally I'd 238 00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:33,830 like to end this talk by summarizing 239 00:10:40,180 --> 00:10:37,850 that ice preserves RNA and it also 240 00:10:43,150 --> 00:10:40,190 preserved an enzymatic functions of your 241 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:43,160 RNA particularly ligation what we're 242 00:10:49,150 --> 00:10:45,890 looking at and you don't need to die 243 00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:49,160 valent cations to do it and it this 244 00:10:54,579 --> 00:10:51,250 ligation reaction also tolerates the 245 00:10:57,070 --> 00:10:54,589 majority of amino acids the osmolytes 246 00:10:58,900 --> 00:10:57,080 that we looked at and you can try using 247 00:11:01,480 --> 00:10:58,910 different buffers in different salts and 248 00:11:04,500 --> 00:11:01,490 you can still get ligation you can 249 00:11:07,180 --> 00:11:04,510 increase the base ligation yield by 250 00:11:07,630 --> 00:11:07,190 freeze-thaw cycles and really this last 251 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:07,640 point 252 00:11:12,550 --> 00:11:09,770 our next step it's to combine thermal 253 00:11:14,530 --> 00:11:12,560 cycling with our best ligation yield and 254 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:14,540 that was that forty percent from acetate 255 00:11:19,270 --> 00:11:16,370 so we want to get above that twenty 256 00:11:33,700 --> 00:11:19,280 percent which is our best so far so 257 00:11:35,890 --> 00:11:33,710 that's it that was really cool have you 258 00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:35,900 given any insight into how this might 259 00:11:40,510 --> 00:11:38,330 vary with pressure because both the 260 00:11:43,270 --> 00:11:40,520 pennsbury I hypothesis and the idea of 261 00:11:46,570 --> 00:11:43,280 delivery of volatile to the earth could 262 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:46,580 mean that if RNA is kind of having fun 263 00:11:51,610 --> 00:11:48,650 ligating itself on comets for a long 264 00:11:54,970 --> 00:11:51,620 time it could be safe there um I don't 265 00:11:56,860 --> 00:11:54,980 know about low pressure but I did look a 266 00:12:00,270 --> 00:11:56,870 little bit into very high pressure and 267 00:12:04,300 --> 00:12:00,280 that could that could actually affect 268 00:12:07,030 --> 00:12:04,310 the way that ice is formed so this this 269 00:12:11,710 --> 00:12:07,040 type of ice it's normal pressure and 270 00:12:13,390 --> 00:12:11,720 it's what phase 1 H ice but with high 271 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:13,400 pressure you get different types of 272 00:12:18,250 --> 00:12:16,370 phases of ice I and I don't know I've 273 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:18,260 never I haven't tried different 274 00:12:30,990 --> 00:12:20,810 pressures it's just what was in our lab 275 00:12:36,100 --> 00:12:33,790 so going off of the pressure in the ice 276 00:12:38,770 --> 00:12:36,110 bit you were mentioning that this 277 00:12:40,090 --> 00:12:38,780 reaction only occurs under these frozen 278 00:12:41,650 --> 00:12:40,100 conditions where you have the solid 279 00:12:43,510 --> 00:12:41,660 phase and you're attributing that to an 280 00:12:44,740 --> 00:12:43,520 increase in the concentration so we 281 00:12:50,290 --> 00:12:44,750 reason to think it might be an effective 282 00:12:53,350 --> 00:12:50,300 surface chemistry with the ice um we 283 00:12:55,750 --> 00:12:53,360 don't know if like for instance we don't 284 00:12:58,930 --> 00:12:55,760 know if the RNA is somehow like 285 00:13:01,720 --> 00:12:58,940 concentrating near the surface the the 286 00:13:05,470 --> 00:13:01,730 the walls of the of those tunnels we 287 00:13:07,390 --> 00:13:05,480 don't know so far all we know is that it 288 00:13:10,380 --> 00:13:07,400 is there is a concentrating effect and 289 00:13:14,430 --> 00:13:10,390 you can visibly see that if you stain it 290 00:13:17,350 --> 00:13:14,440 if you stay in the RNA and you detect 291 00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:17,360 fluorescence but